Maybe Not everyone carrying an axe is just a lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Not likely, since most lumberjacks do not generally carry their axes around with them on evenings out. But two stories have popped up in the news showing that non-lumberjacks don’t necessarily stick to these rules.
Axing For Trouble
The first of these two tales of violence took place in a town club in Fontaniva, Italy, the place where a disgruntled gambler decided to exact their revenge on some slots that are unsuspecting after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in 2 weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and video clip websites that are streaming where watchers can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
The machine hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits after blowing off steam. Either it was an indicator of victory, or a show of friendship towards these particular machines. Whenever coping with crazy, interpretations are anybody’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a nearby bar.
‘ He comes in here all the right time to play the machines,’ said who owns the bar, whom chose probably wisely- to keep nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a lot of cash. He’s a laborer and only works any now and then.’ evidently, this is one worker who keeps his equipment that is own handy.
‘He’s normally a really man that is quiet. He just moved in really calmly with an axe and smashed all the machines. There were several customers by them at the time and additionally they were terrified,’ he included.
The man was sentenced for six months for criminal damage and possession of an offensive weapon as a result of his strangely calm yet violent outburst. But prison overcrowding got him off with absolutely nothing more than a slap on the hand.
But Wait, There’s More…
The 2nd among these two tales is a bit more terrifying, due to the fact axe was wielded maybe not at the slots, but at a member of the staff at a shop that is betting the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ incident left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes shop that is betting Cardiff ‘in circumstances of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making down with some cash, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over their head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ employee with injury or worse if he didn’t comply.
A police spokesperson investigating the criminal activity stated that two men, both wearing ski masks, entered the bookie’s store at 9:30 pm regarding the night of the incident. One calmly endured guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the assistant using the tree-chopping weapon.
The frightened store assistant then handed over what police called a ‘quantity of cash,’ and also the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven with a suspect that is third.
Police are now appealing to the public that is local information that could help apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did perhaps not wait calmly for arresting officers to arrive regarding the scene.
Whose Casino Is It Anyway? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out
The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
Whilst every of the three licensing battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has already established its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight on the casino slated to be located in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston candidate that is mayoral threatening a lawsuit over one such proposal that would put a casino in the neighboring town of Everett.
The legal choice is pertaining to the theory that neighboring communities would be affected by casino projects, but won’t have an opportunity to vote on whether those casinos must certanly be opened in the first place. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, an applicant for mayor of Boston, was one of the handful of prospects whom have recommended that all of Boston should be able to vote on a casino that could be positioned in East Boston, as an example.
When it comes down to the proposed Wynn casino project in Everett, Conley says that allowing only Everett residents to vote about it is unfair to the surrounding communities. If the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would register suit to stop the Everett casino based regarding the impact it might have on many Boston communities.
‘The Wynn proposal had been voted…on in just one community,’ Conley said within a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will bear its traffic, economic, and social burdens but get none of the proposed benefits.’
In line with the state laws that produced the opportunity for three casinos that are new Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually get a vote on whether or not allowing the projects to be built. However, casino designers are required to negotiate settlement, with arbitration needed if the casinos and neighborhood governments can’t arrived at a resolution by themselves.
Conley has proposed going for a path that is not actually outlined in the 2011 casino law in terms of the East Boston casino proposal, one that is being produced by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He might have the complete city of Boston vote on whether to approve the proposal, while nevertheless giving East Boston veto power within the whole vote. In other terms, the casino could have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the complete city to be able to be authorized.
Yay or Nay?
A Boston Globe survey found that six of the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question were in favor of it, with just two coming out against it (with Conley and one other candidate not answering the question) while Conley has not specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposal. Meanwhile, four of ten prospects supported allowing the city that is entire vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to just East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents discovered that 44% had been and only the casino, while 37% opposed it.
Even when voters return these proposals, just one will ultimately be chosen by hawaii as the site that is future of casino in the Boston area. Along side the Everett and East Boston casino plans, there is a proposal that is competing Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO
Chuka Umunna, taken fully to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the increasing celebrity of the UK’s Labour Party who has publicly announced his discontent towards the bookmaking industry got his own hand caught in the recreations book cookie jar after accepting a donation of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from a retired leading recreations company that is betting.
Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation
As a betting shop critic whom has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna nonetheless accepted the large contribution from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden https://myfreepokies.com/more-chilli-slot-review/, causing members of the Conservative Party to call out of the shadow business secretary, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double requirements.
Since Gala Coral Group is certainly one associated with the largest bookies in Britain and accounts for a large numbers of betting outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the country- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign aimed at reducing the spread of bookies and betting shops in the area roads of his London that is south Streatham, and went so far as to promise ‘new powers to get a grip on the number of betting shops.’
‘I understand there is huge concern that some streets in our area are steadily filling with betting shops and payday loan businesses that take advantage of our community, rather than help us,’ wrote Umunna in a written report to local voters earlier this year.
‘ Can anyone really credibly believe anything Chuka ever Umunna says?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says something in public places and does another behind closed doors. Their hypocrisy seems to be limitless.’ And that’s very unusual for a politician.
Spared for a Technicality
Nevertheless, fighting back the corner associated with the Labour Party MP, a spokesperson for Umunna stated that ‘this contribution was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a personal capacity, and was accepted in accordance using the rules and properly declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the working workplace of Chuka Umunna in his capability as Shadow Secretary of State for Business, as well as for staffing,’ so it does officially pass as legitimate.
And even though Goulden is no further a relative head of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he spent as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group implies that he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether it is a donation that is completely innocent not, and whether or otherwise not the Conservative Party may just be searching to ruin the promotion of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after taking such a hard stance against the spread of the industry in their local constituency.
‘ The only thing we know he really believes is that the capital is full of ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ advertised Bob Neill.
Umunna, who is thought to be considered a future Labour Party leader, has experienced his fair share of embarrassment as earlier this year his office was accused of modifying their Wikipedia page to exhibit evaluations between himself and Barack Obama.